<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The All-Seeing Eye</title>
	<atom:link href="http://panoptical.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://panoptical.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Musings from the central tower...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 04:36:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Postmodernism vs. Cuntalinagate by Post-RaceFail: A Post-Colonial, Post-Modern Take &#171; The All-Seeing Eye</title>
		<link>http://panoptical.wordpress.com/2009/05/31/postmodernism-vs-cuntalinagate/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Post-RaceFail: A Post-Colonial, Post-Modern Take &#171; The All-Seeing Eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 04:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://panoptical.wordpress.com/?p=21#comment-76</guid>
		<description>[...] can&#8217;t or won&#8217;t write good non-white characters.  Look at the issue of RaceFail from a Butlerian perspective: rather than asking why the authors in positions of power are insensitive to issues of race, we ask [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] can&#8217;t or won&#8217;t write good non-white characters.  Look at the issue of RaceFail from a Butlerian perspective: rather than asking why the authors in positions of power are insensitive to issues of race, we ask [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Postmodernism vs. Cuntalinagate by Comrade PhysioProf</title>
		<link>http://panoptical.wordpress.com/2009/05/31/postmodernism-vs-cuntalinagate/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Comrade PhysioProf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://panoptical.wordpress.com/?p=21#comment-75</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;IBTP has categories to describe those who cleave strictly to these rules, and those who deviate in some acceptable way, and those who deviate in an unacceptable way (for instance, to be a “funfem” or a “sex-positive feminist” or a “nice guy” is to take an acceptable non-radfem position from which to argue, and be argued with; to be an “MRA” is to take an unacceptable non-radfem position to argue from).&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This is a very picky nit, but as far as I can tell &quot;nice guy&quot; --at least as traditionally used sarcastically to refer to dudes who complain that women don&#039;t like them even though they are so &quot;nice&quot;--is not an acceptable non-radfem position from which to argue at IBTP.

My evidence for this is that I have never seen any comments at IBTP in the last few years written from this position. I suppose it&#039;s possible that none have been submitted in that time frame, but I consider it more likely that Twisty doesn&#039;t allow them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>IBTP has categories to describe those who cleave strictly to these rules, and those who deviate in some acceptable way, and those who deviate in an unacceptable way (for instance, to be a “funfem” or a “sex-positive feminist” or a “nice guy” is to take an acceptable non-radfem position from which to argue, and be argued with; to be an “MRA” is to take an unacceptable non-radfem position to argue from).</p></blockquote>
<p>This is a very picky nit, but as far as I can tell &#8220;nice guy&#8221; &#8211;at least as traditionally used sarcastically to refer to dudes who complain that women don&#8217;t like them even though they are so &#8220;nice&#8221;&#8211;is not an acceptable non-radfem position from which to argue at IBTP.</p>
<p>My evidence for this is that I have never seen any comments at IBTP in the last few years written from this position. I suppose it&#8217;s possible that none have been submitted in that time frame, but I consider it more likely that Twisty doesn&#8217;t allow them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Prisoner&#8217;s Dilemma and the Panopticon by Panoptic Power and Competition &#171; The All-Seeing Eye</title>
		<link>http://panoptical.wordpress.com/2008/02/17/the-prisoners-dilemma-and-the-panopticon/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Panoptic Power and Competition &#171; The All-Seeing Eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 08:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://panoptical.wordpress.com/?p=9#comment-64</guid>
		<description>[...] power of the panopticon, then do the same downsides exist?  Sure.  One of these is that PD-like situations may arise in which competitors end up reaching a suboptimal equilibrium state [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] power of the panopticon, then do the same downsides exist?  Sure.  One of these is that PD-like situations may arise in which competitors end up reaching a suboptimal equilibrium state [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Free Will, Determinism, and Motivation by m Andrea</title>
		<link>http://panoptical.wordpress.com/2008/02/10/free-will-determinism-and-motivation/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>m Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 00:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://panoptical.wordpress.com/?p=8#comment-63</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;I’ve never really believed in free will. I’ve always thought that everything is already determined by particle vectors, that everything I do is explainable by something that happened to me in childhood or by a set of circumstances that outlined my choice to such an extent that I didn’t really have a choice.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Amazingly enough, your opinion is not a reason.  Now, give me an actual reason you do not have free will.  Claiming you do not have free will is just a way to avoid to taking responsibility for your own behavior.

&lt;i&gt;&quot;Changing the rules of the game is what I’m aiming for, but it’s going to take a lot of searching to find the right game and a lot of convincing to get people to play it.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

That is assuming free will.  Make up your mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;I’ve never really believed in free will. I’ve always thought that everything is already determined by particle vectors, that everything I do is explainable by something that happened to me in childhood or by a set of circumstances that outlined my choice to such an extent that I didn’t really have a choice.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Amazingly enough, your opinion is not a reason.  Now, give me an actual reason you do not have free will.  Claiming you do not have free will is just a way to avoid to taking responsibility for your own behavior.</p>
<p><i>&#8220;Changing the rules of the game is what I’m aiming for, but it’s going to take a lot of searching to find the right game and a lot of convincing to get people to play it.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>That is assuming free will.  Make up your mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Authentic Human Desire vs. Power by m Andrea</title>
		<link>http://panoptical.wordpress.com/2008/04/26/authentic-human-desire-vs-power/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>m Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 23:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://panoptical.wordpress.com/?p=14#comment-62</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, there is a reason someone accused you of being a misogynist.  But this goes along with something I read somewhere else, where the minority but still significant viewpoint was &quot;well rape is awful but as women, you&#039;re just gonna have to suck up the likelyhood of being raped&quot;.

Men insist they are soooooo logical, yet they never take things to their logical conclusion.  

Mmmmm, how &#039;bout men just accept that they are all possible rapists as far as a women is concerned, and she get to carry a nice weapon at all times and they don&#039;t?  And she pays a $25 fine every time she blows some guy&#039;s kneecap out with a taser?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, there is a reason someone accused you of being a misogynist.  But this goes along with something I read somewhere else, where the minority but still significant viewpoint was &#8220;well rape is awful but as women, you&#8217;re just gonna have to suck up the likelyhood of being raped&#8221;.</p>
<p>Men insist they are soooooo logical, yet they never take things to their logical conclusion.  </p>
<p>Mmmmm, how &#8217;bout men just accept that they are all possible rapists as far as a women is concerned, and she get to carry a nice weapon at all times and they don&#8217;t?  And she pays a $25 fine every time she blows some guy&#8217;s kneecap out with a taser?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monopoly by m Andrea</title>
		<link>http://panoptical.wordpress.com/2008/06/04/monopoly/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>m Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 23:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://panoptical.wordpress.com/?p=16#comment-61</guid>
		<description>This was a fantastic analogy, and thank you very much.  Really makes me want to increase affirmative action etc, not merely keep it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a fantastic analogy, and thank you very much.  Really makes me want to increase affirmative action etc, not merely keep it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monopoly by Sasha</title>
		<link>http://panoptical.wordpress.com/2008/06/04/monopoly/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Sasha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 20:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://panoptical.wordpress.com/?p=16#comment-60</guid>
		<description>The history of the game is fairly interesting, you know</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The history of the game is fairly interesting, you know</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monopoly by barquera</title>
		<link>http://panoptical.wordpress.com/2008/06/04/monopoly/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>barquera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 05:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://panoptical.wordpress.com/?p=16#comment-59</guid>
		<description>nice post;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice post;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Economics Foundation by Joshua Kwentoh</title>
		<link>http://panoptical.wordpress.com/2008/03/02/economics-foundation/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Kwentoh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://panoptical.wordpress.com/?p=11#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Nice Site layout. Keep up the good work. Looking forward to reading more from you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice Site layout. Keep up the good work. Looking forward to reading more from you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Organized Labor:  A Power Analysis by Cooperation and Membership &#171; The All-Seeing Eye</title>
		<link>http://panoptical.wordpress.com/2008/02/24/organized-labor-a-power-analysis/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Cooperation and Membership &#171; The All-Seeing Eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 01:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://panoptical.wordpress.com/?p=10#comment-34</guid>
		<description>[...] and&#160;Membership In Organized Labor: A Power Analysis, I examined the power relationships involved in the formation of a labor union. In one sense, the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and&nbsp;Membership In Organized Labor: A Power Analysis, I examined the power relationships involved in the formation of a labor union. In one sense, the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
